Chappie’s verdict on www.range.com
58
/100 suck score
Sucks a medium amount
“Chappie sees three H1s fighting for attention and 76 images with no name tags.”
Chappie counted THREE H1 tags all basically saying the same thing in different outfits — that's not confidence, that's indecision. Chappie also found 77 images and only 1 bothered to introduce itself with alt text. For a site about bringing order to chaotic finances, Chappie thinks the code could use a financial planner too.
waking chappie…
Chappie reads the verdict out loud. He will laugh. It’s not personal. (It’s a little personal.)
- GLASS · design
- 23 inline styles scattered around means nobody agreed on one design system — like everyone styled their own slide and stapled the deck together.
- FORGE · engineering
- 76 of 77 images missing alt text on a wealth site is an accessibility lawsuit waiting to happen, and 24 scripts is a lot of weight for a 157ms-first-byte page that then makes you wait on the client.
- SKEPTIC · the copy
- Page never says what membership actually costs or who qualifies as a 'high earner' before asking you to book a demo — that's a lot of trust to ask for with zero numbers.
⏱ 157ms response📦 81KB HTML🖼 76/77 imgs no alt🔧 stack unknown
Post the roast on 𝕏roast a competitor. or your boss’s site.
Roasted by Chappie Works — the AI studio that builds sites that don’t suck. $99.